> In article
> <e8e774ac-11a7-46fd-8364-2e62d2d95...@v21g2000pro.googlegroups.com>,
>
>
>
>
>
> "Tin@" <tinas49...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > On Jul 19, 11:27 am, Anim8rFSK <ANIM8R...@cox.net> wrote:
> > > In article <2YudnTZ6WcJ0lx VnZ2dnUVZ uudn...@comcast.com>,
> > > "Newk Indofman" <newk.indof...@lovesyou.org> wrote:
>
> > > > "Vandar" <vanda...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > > >news:8Jegk.72114$fX5.65003@fe109.usenetserver.com...
> > > > > Newk Indofman wrote:
>
> > > > >> "Nathan Sanders" <nathansand...@aol.com> wrote in message
> > > > >>news:nathansanders-86672E.18350018072008@64.209.0-93.rev.gaoland.net...
>
> > > > >>>In article <7tWdnTwhIabCixzVnZ2dnUVZ vedn...@comcast.com>,
> > > > >>>"Newk Indofman" <newk.indof...@lovesyou.org> wrote:
>
> > > > >>>>"Nathan Sanders" <nathansand...@aol.com> wrote in message
> > > > >>>>news:nathansanders-7BE334.14090418072008@64.209.0-93.rev.gaoland.net..
> > > > >>>>.
>
> > > > >>>>>Paying millions of dollars to extend her life is ludicrous. Why
> > > > >>>>>should *convicted, unrepentant murders* receive free health care
> > > > >>>>>when
> > > > >>>>>the rest of us don't? I'd much rather take the $1.5 million or so
> > > > >>>>>needed to keep her alive another six months and spend it on anyone
> > > > >>>>>else with cancer *who didn't commit murder*.
>
> > > > >>>>OK, don't give her health care. But do we have to toss her in a
> > > > >>>>dumpster?
>
> > > > >>>Note that Vandar, not me, is the dumpster-advocate! I'm fine with
> > > > >>>leaving her in her cell, and letting the cancer eat it her up.
>
> > > > >> And if she was your daughter? Your wife? Your mother?
>
> > > > > Then I'd be willing to pay the medical bills myself.
>
> > > > Thus, her life has value for someone.
>
>
> > Her husband would beg to differ.
>
> So he's wrong.
