> In article
> <645c8540-9146-424b-9759-aeec7d62b4f6@j1g2000prb.googlegroups.com>,
> "Tin@" <tinas49ers@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>>On Jul 18, 11:09 am, Nathan Sanders <nathansand...@aol.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Paying millions of dollars to extend her life is ludicrous. Why
>>>should *convicted, unrepentant murders* receive free health care when
>>>the rest of us don't? I'd much rather take the $1.5 million or so
>>>needed to keep her alive another six months and spend it on anyone
>>>else with cancer *who didn't commit murder*.
>>
>>Then do something to change the laws,
>
>
> I don't live in California. Do you think it's appropriate for me to
> come from out of state and force you guys to spend your taxes the way
> I think they should be spent? It's *your* money!
>
>
>>in the meantime, we are required
>>to treat people humanely, even if they haven't treated others
>>humanely.
>
>
> Thanks to liberals being soft on crime. "Oh you killed eight people,
> including an unborn child? You poor thing, here, have some free
> health care, by the good graces of the taxpayers of California!"
