In article
<645c8540-9146-424b-9759-aeec7d62b4f6@j1g2000prb.googlegroups.com>,
"Tin@" <tinas49ers@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Jul 18, 11:09 am, Nathan Sanders <nathansand...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> > Paying millions of dollars to extend her life is ludicrous. Why
> > should *convicted, unrepentant murders* receive free health care when
> > the rest of us don't? I'd much rather take the $1.5 million or so
> > needed to keep her alive another six months and spend it on anyone
> > else with cancer *who didn't commit murder*.
>
> Then do something to change the laws,
I don't live in California. Do you think it's appropriate for me to
come from out of state and force you guys to spend your taxes the way
I think they should be spent? It's *your* money!
> in the meantime, we are required
> to treat people humanely, even if they haven't treated others
> humanely.
Thanks to liberals being soft on crime. "Oh you killed eight people,
including an unborn child? You poor thing, here, have some free
health care, by the good graces of the taxpayers of California!"
Nathan
