On Jul 19, 11:27 am, Anim8rFSK <ANIM8R...@cox.net> wrote:
> In article <2YudnTZ6WcJ0lx_VnZ2dnUVZ_uudn...@comcast.com>,
> "Newk Indofman" <newk.indof...@lovesyou.org> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > "Vandar" <vanda...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> >news:8Jegk.72114$fX5.65003@fe109.usenetserver.com...
> > > Newk Indofman wrote:
>
> > >> "Nathan Sanders" <nathansand...@aol.com> wrote in message
> > >>news:nathansanders-86672E.18350018072008@64.209.0-93.rev.gaoland.net...
>
> > >>>In article <7tWdnTwhIabCixzVnZ2dnUVZ_vedn...@comcast.com>,
> > >>>"Newk Indofman" <newk.indof...@lovesyou.org> wrote:
>
> > >>>>"Nathan Sanders" <nathansand...@aol.com> wrote in message
> > >>>>news:nathansanders-7BE334.14090418072008@64.209.0-93.rev.gaoland.net...
>
> > >>>>>Paying millions of dollars to extend her life is ludicrous. Why
> > >>>>>should *convicted, unrepentant murders* receive free health care when
> > >>>>>the rest of us don't? I'd much rather take the $1.5 million or so
> > >>>>>needed to keep her alive another six months and spend it on anyone
> > >>>>>else with cancer *who didn't commit murder*.
>
> > >>>>OK, don't give her health care. But do we have to toss her in a
> > >>>>dumpster?
>
> > >>>Note that Vandar, not me, is the dumpster-advocate! I'm fine with
> > >>>leaving her in her cell, and letting the cancer eat it her up.
>
> > >> And if she was your daughter? Your wife? Your mother?
>
> > > Then I'd be willing to pay the medical bills myself.
>
> > Thus, her life has value for someone.
>
> No. It doesn't.
Her husband would beg to differ.
>
> --
> Star Trek 09:
>
> No Shat, No Show.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
