"Nathan Sanders" <nathansanders@aol.com> wrote in message
news:nathansanders-E2B2A8.01061719072008@64.209.0-93.rev.gaoland.net...
> In article <Ev2dnTQTHr0X9xzVnZ2dnUVZ_i2dnZ2d@comcast.com>,
> "Newk Indofman" <newk.indofman@lovesyou.org> wrote:
>
>> Who gets to determine whose life has value and whose doesn't?
>
> In Susan Adkins's case, she made that determination all by herself.
> By committing murder, she subtracted from the world, making a very
> definitive statement about what she had to offer us.
>
> If she didn't want us to think her life had no value, she shouldn't
> have demonstrated how little value she herself placed on life.
How can you say that anyone's life has "no value"?
Right now, you're using a single event in Susan Adkins' life, pathetic as it
is, to massage your own conscience and worth. I don't mean this as a
personal attack, but perhaps a little more humility might be appropriate.
It's also telling how those who claim to be "pro-life" are usually the first
to judge the worth of others' lives.
