On Jul 18, 10:50 am, "Newk Indofman" <newk.indof...@lovesyou.org>
wrote:
> "Thanatos" <atro...@mac.com> wrote in message
>
> news:atropos-952E21.09374318072008@news.giganews.com...
>
>
>
> > In article <dpadneWZscpYDR3VnZ2dnUVZ_vedn...@comcast.com>,
> > "Newk Indofman" <newk.indof...@lovesyou.org> wrote:
>
> >> "Vandar" <vanda...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> >>news:AcVfk.104856$c5.59287@fe101.usenetserver.com...
> >> > Newk Indofman wrote:
> >> >> "Vandar" <vanda...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> >> >>news:LERfk.2428$Jz4.26@fe085.usenetserver.com...
>
>
> >> >>>>In article <emRfk.2426$Jz4.1...@fe085.usenetserver.com>,
> >> >>>> Vandar <vanda...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >> >>>>>Thanatos wrote:
>
> >> >>>>>>In article <g5nnrj0...@news5.newsguy.com>,
> >> >>>>>>"Sanna" <sanna_onaneedtoknowbasiso...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >> >>>>>>>Vandar wrote:
>
> >> >>>>>>>>OJ not being convicted doesn't mean Susan Atkins should be set
> >> >>>>>>>>free.
> >> >>>>>>>>She was convicted of participating in eight murders and
> >> >>>>>>>>originally
> >> >>>>>>>>sentenced to death. At no point should she ever see the world
> >> >>>>>>>>outside of a prison cell. To hell with her. I hope she's in pain.
>
> >> >>>>>>>She bragged about killing Tate and her baby and even admitted that
> >> >>>>>>>she kept stabbing her because she was sick and tired of hearing
> >> >>>>>>>her
> >> >>>>>>>begging and pleading for her life and the life of her baby. In
> >> >>>>>>>the
> >> >>>>>>>40 years since the murders she has *yet* to show any remorse. I
> >> >>>>>>>don't know how anyone could even consider giving her a
> >> >>>>>>>compassionate
> >> >>>>>>>release. Being alive in prison is a helluva lot more comfortable
> >> >>>>>>>than where she's going.
>
> >> >>>>>>The only way I'd consider it is if it was clear she wasn't going to
> >> >>>>>>get any taxpayer-funded medical assistance on the outside. As it
> >> >>>>>>is,
> >> >>>>>>we're footing the bill for her better-than-average medical care
> >> >>>>>>inside
> >> >>>>>>the prison.
>
> >> >>>>>>Let her out and let her rot in a pool of her own filth.
>
> >> >>>>>She isn't in a prison hospital. She's in a hospital "near the
> >> >>>>>prison".
> >> >>>>>To date, it has cost taxpayers $1.5 million for her medical care and
> >> >>>>>another $300k for the guards outside her door since she was sent
> >> >>>>>there
> >> >>>>>in March.
>
> >> >>>>My point exactly.
>
> >> >>>Yup. As far as I'm concerned, they should pull the tubes, cancel the
> >> >>>medication, tell the guards to go home, and toss her in the dumpster
> >> >>>out
> >> >>>back. Check on her every couple of hours to see if she's still alive,
> >> >>>and
> >> >>>when she's dead, call the sanitation company to come empty the
> >> >>>dumpster.
>
> >> >> That would make their actions no better than hers, right?
>
> >> > She would have a natural death, unlike the people she killed.
>
> >> Intentionally tossing a gravely sick person in a dumpster to hasten her
> >> death is intentional, at least for civilized people who claim to have a
> >> moral code.
>
> > So leave out the dumpster. There's no reason the public coffers should
> > be drained to string along the vegetative remains of some unrepentant
> > psychopath.
>
> The prinicples of the US justice system are supposed to involve *humane*
> treatment of criminals, because allegedly, we are a *humane* people. If the
> *cruel and unusual* is what you would prefer, perhaps you should go live
> under the rule of the Taliban, where you'll feel more at home.
Would not the *humane* thing to have done with this woman been a just
and swift execution, per the sentence of the jury in her trial -
instead of forced imprisonment and confined to a small jail cell for
almost 40yrs? Would a *humane* society even allow that of animals?
> > If she or her family can afford their own care, great. If
> > not, well those are the consequences of deciding to gleefully gut a
> > pregnant woman.
