In article <h_qfk.64173$fX5.56595@fe109.usenetserver.com>,
Vandar <vandar69@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Suzanne D. wrote:
>
> > "Bob Rudd" <bobrudd@verizon.net> wrote in message
> > news:MPG.22e75f8679383019898af@news.albasani.net...
> >
> >>
> >>Justice prevails....or karma comes full circle.
> >>
> >>http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/25692507/
> >
> >
> > Eh, why not just release her for the next three months she has to live? If
> > that football star who murdered his wife and that other guy is still
> > walking
> > around free (despite having written a detailed book about how he "would
> > have
> > done it"), then the woman who killed an actress 40 years ago under a
> > drugged, quasi-religious stupor should get the last three months of her
> > life
> > to go to a movie.
>
> OJ not being convicted doesn't mean Susan Atkins should be set free.
> She was convicted of participating in eight murders and originally
> sentenced to death. At no point should she ever see the world outside of
> a prison cell. To hell with her. I hope she's in pain.
I wonder how much money California would save if they released her?
Her medical bills are apparently pretty ridiculous, something like a
quarter of a million dollars every month.
If she lasts six more months, California could save $1.5 million by
letting her go.
I wouldn't even consider letting her go if her health care costs
weren't an issue.
Nathan
